SayPro Judging Evaluation Template: A document for judges to rate each project based on predefined criteria.

SayPro Judging Evaluation Template
Quarterly Innovation Challenge Judging Evaluation
Version 1.0
Date: [Insert Date]

---

1. Participant Information

Provide participant details to identify the project being evaluated.

• Project Title:
  [Enter Project Title]
• Team Name (if applicable):
  [Enter Team Name]
• Judge Name:
  [Enter Judge’s Name]
• Date of Evaluation:
  [DD/MM/YYYY]

---

2. Evaluation Criteria

Each project will be evaluated based on the following criteria. Judges should provide a rating on a scale of 1 to 5 for each criterion, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent.

Criteria	Rating (1-5)	Comments
Creativity and Innovation	[1-5]	[Provide feedback on the originality and innovation of the solution. Does the idea present a fresh approach to solving the problem?]
Feasibility	[1-5]	[Evaluate the technical and practical feasibility of the solution. Is the solution achievable with current technology, resources, and within the timeline?]
Impact	[1-5]	[Assess the potential impact of the solution. How significant will the solution be for the target audience or society?]
Market Potential	[1-5]	[Consider the solution’s potential for market success. Does it have a clear target market? Is there demand for the solution?]
Scalability	[1-5]	[Evaluate how well the solution can be scaled or expanded. Can the project grow and reach a wider audience or impact?]
Clarity and Communication	[1-5]	[Assess the clarity of the project presentation. Was the idea communicated effectively, and were the project details well-organized?]
Sustainability	[1-5]	[Assess the long-term sustainability of the project. Does the solution consider environmental, social, or financial sustainability?]
Prototype or Demonstration	[1-5]	[Evaluate the quality of the prototype or demo provided. How well does the prototype demonstrate the solution in action?]
Problem-Solving Ability	[1-5]	[Assess how well the solution addresses the identified problem. Is the solution the right fit for the problem at hand?]
Overall Presentation	[1-5]	[Consider the overall impression of the project. Was the presentation engaging, well-organized, and convincing?]

---

3. Additional Criteria

Judges can include any other factors or considerations that may be important to the evaluation of the project.

• Additional Criteria or Comments:
  [Provide any other factors that contributed to the evaluation of the project.]

---

4. Final Comments and Recommendations

Judges can provide a brief summary of their overall impression of the project and any suggestions for improvement or next steps.

• Overall Evaluation (Max 300 words):
  [Provide a summary of your evaluation. What are the project’s strengths and weaknesses? Are there any recommendations for improvement or further development?]
• Final Recommendation (Select one):
  • Awarded
  • Highly Recommended for Development
  • Needs Improvement
  • Not Recommended

---

5. Judge’s Signature

By signing below, you confirm that the evaluation has been completed fairly and in accordance with the provided criteria.

• Judge’s Signature:
  [Enter Signature]

---

Submit Button
[Submit Evaluation]

---

This SayPro Judging Evaluation Template provides a structured way for judges to assess each project based on specific, predefined criteria. It ensures a fair and thorough evaluation process, encouraging judges to provide feedback on key areas such as creativity, feasibility, impact, and market potential.