SayPro Judging Criteria Template: A document outlining how each performance will be evaluated (creativity, execution, cultural significance, etc.).

SayPro Judging Criteria Template

Purpose:

This template outlines the criteria and scoring system to be used by judges to evaluate performances at SayPro events. It ensures fairness, transparency, and a comprehensive review of each performance based on clearly defined elements.

Evaluation Categories and Descriptions:

Judges will assign scores based on the following five key categories:

1. Creativity and Originality (20 points)

Definition:
The uniqueness of the performance concept, originality of content, and innovative presentation.

Considerations:

Is the performance imaginative and fresh?
Does it present a new perspective or artistic interpretation?
Are ideas expressed in an unexpected or thought-provoking way?

Scoring Guide:

0–5: Little to no originality
6–10: Some original elements but predictable
11–15: Strong creativity with distinct touches
16–20: Highly original and outstandingly creative

2. Technical Execution and Skill (20 points)

Definition:
The level of proficiency demonstrated in performing the selected medium (dance, music, speech, etc.).

Considerations:

Was the performance delivered with accuracy and control?
How well did the performer master their technique?
Were transitions smooth and timing precise?

Scoring Guide:

0–5: Weak technical performance, many errors
6–10: Moderate skill, some mistakes
11–15: Good technical ability, few errors
16–20: Flawless or nearly flawless execution

3. Cultural Significance and Relevance (20 points)

Definition:
The extent to which the performance reflects, honors, or draws from a particular cultural or social background.

Considerations:

Is there a clear cultural context or theme?
Was the representation respectful and authentic?
Does the piece educate or raise awareness about a culture?

Scoring Guide:

0–5: No apparent cultural connection
6–10: Weak or unclear cultural relevance
11–15: Meaningful connection to culture
16–20: Deeply rooted in cultural tradition with clear intent

4. Stage Presence and Engagement (20 points)

Definition:
The performer’s ability to connect with the audience and command attention throughout the performance.

Considerations:

Was the performer confident and expressive?
Did they maintain audience interest and interaction?
Were gestures, movement, and emotion appropriate?

Scoring Guide:

0–5: Disconnected or uncomfortable stage presence
6–10: Some confidence, limited engagement
11–15: Good presence and audience connection
16–20: Captivating, fully engaging performance

5. Overall Impact and Impression (20 points)

Definition:
The general effect of the performance as a whole—how memorable or powerful it was.

Considerations:

Did the performance leave a lasting impression?
Was it cohesive and well-structured?
Did it evoke emotion or provoke thought?

Scoring Guide:

0–5: Forgettable, poorly structured
6–10: Moderately interesting
11–15: Strong, impactful presentation
16–20: Exceptional and unforgettable performance

Total Score: \_\_\_\_ / 100

Comments Section (Optional but Encouraged):

Strengths of the Performance:
\[Enter comments here]

Areas for Improvement:
\[Enter comments here]

Additional Notes or Feedback:
\[Enter comments here]

Judges’ Details:

Judge Name: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Signature: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
Date: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Instructions for Judges:

Please be fair and consistent across all performances.
Avoid bias based on personal preferences.
Use the full scoring range where appropriate.
Provide constructive feedback when possible.

Would you like this formatted as a downloadable PDF or editable Word document?