SayPro Impact Evaluation Template

Research Objective Title:

• Objective Title: [Insert Objective Title Here]
• Research Period: [Insert Date Range]
• Prepared by: [Insert Your Name/Team Name]
• Date of Evaluation: [Insert Date]

2. Overview of Objective and Impact:

• Objective Description:
  [Provide a brief summary of the research objective. What was the goal of the study and what specific outcomes were anticipated?]
• Expected Impact:
  [Describe the expected outcomes or changes that would result from successfully achieving the objective. This could include policy changes, social improvements, economic growth, etc.]

3. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):

• KPI 1: [KPI Name]
  Definition: [How this KPI will be measured]
  Target: [The desired result or benchmark for success]
  Measurement Method: [Explain how this will be tracked or calculated]
• KPI 2: [KPI Name]
  Definition: [How this KPI will be measured]
  Target: [The desired result or benchmark for success]
  Measurement Method: [Explain how this will be tracked or calculated]
• KPI 3: [KPI Name]
  Definition: [How this KPI will be measured]
  Target: [The desired result or benchmark for success]
  Measurement Method: [Explain how this will be tracked or calculated]

4. Impact Metrics Evaluation:

5. Evaluation Methodology:

• Data Collection:
  [Outline how data was collected to evaluate the impact, such as surveys, interviews, secondary data analysis, etc.]
• Data Analysis:
  [Describe the methods used for analyzing the data and how these methods are aligned with the KPIs.]
• Sample Size & Demographics:
  [Provide information on the sample size and any demographic breakdowns if applicable to the evaluation.]

6. Impact Summary and Interpretation:

• Summary of Findings:
  [Provide a summary of the findings based on the KPIs and impact metrics. Have the objectives been met? What are the key outcomes?]
• Positive Impacts:
  [Highlight any positive outcomes resulting from the research, such as policy adoption, economic improvements, or social benefits.]
• Negative or Neutral Impacts:
  [Describe any challenges or areas where the objectives did not fully meet expectations. Include reasons for underperformance if identified.]
• Unanticipated Outcomes:
  [Note any unexpected outcomes or findings that emerged during the research process, either positive or negative.]

7. Recommendations for Future Research/Action:

• Policy Recommendations:
  [If relevant, suggest changes to current policies based on the impact of the research.]
• Areas for Improvement:
  [Suggest areas where the research methodology or approach could be improved in future studies.]
• Further Research:
  [Propose additional studies or research directions that may help in further assessing or building upon the current research outcomes.]

8. Conclusion:

• Overall Impact Assessment:
  [Provide a conclusion about the overall success of the research in achieving its objectives. Did the research meet the intended goals? Was the impact significant?]

Example of Completed Impact Evaluation Template:

1. Research Objective Title:

• Objective Title: Assess the Impact of Policy X on Local Employment Rates
• Research Period: January 2025 – March 2025
• Prepared by: SayPro Research Team
• Date of Evaluation: April 10, 2025

2. Overview of Objective and Impact:

• Objective Description:
  The objective was to assess the economic impact of Policy X on local employment rates, focusing specifically on small businesses in urban areas.
• Expected Impact:
  The expected outcome was a measurable increase in employment rates within small businesses, with secondary benefits to local economies.

3. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):

• KPI 1: Employment Rate in Small Businesses
  Definition: Percentage increase in the number of people employed by small businesses post-policy implementation.
  Target: 10% increase in employment rates.
  Measurement Method: Survey of small businesses before and after policy implementation.
• KPI 2: Economic Growth in Urban Areas
  Definition: Growth in local GDP due to increased employment and productivity in small businesses.
  Target: 5% increase in local GDP.
  Measurement Method: Economic report analysis and GDP statistics.
• KPI 3: Stakeholder Satisfaction
  Definition: Satisfaction levels of business owners with the policy’s impact on their operations.
  Target: 80% satisfaction rate.
  Measurement Method: Survey of business owners and stakeholders.

4. Impact Metrics Evaluation:

5. Evaluation Methodology:

• Data Collection:
  Data was collected through surveys of small business owners and employees, as well as economic reports from local government sources.
• Data Analysis:
  Data was analyzed using statistical tools to compare employment rates and GDP before and after policy implementation.
• Sample Size & Demographics:
  The survey sample included 100 small business owners in urban areas, with a mix of business types and employee demographics.

6. Impact Summary and Interpretation:

• Summary of Findings:
  The research successfully showed that Policy X led to increased employment in small businesses, with a notable 12% increase in employment. However, the economic growth fell slightly short of the target, with a 4.5% increase in GDP instead of the anticipated 5%.
• Positive Impacts:
  Positive changes included increased job retention and stakeholder satisfaction, indicating that the policy had beneficial effects on small businesses.
• Negative or Neutral Impacts:
  The slight underperformance in GDP growth suggests that other factors may have influenced economic growth outside of the policy’s scope.
• Unanticipated Outcomes:
  An unanticipated positive outcome was the high level of stakeholder satisfaction, which exceeded expectations.

7. Recommendations for Future Research/Action:

• Policy Recommendations:
  Future policies should further support small businesses in underperforming sectors to boost overall economic growth.
• Areas for Improvement:
  Future research should explore external factors affecting economic growth beyond the scope of the policy.
• Further Research:
  A deeper study into the long-term effects of Policy X on small business profitability and sustainability would provide more comprehensive insights.