SayPro Create Post-Training Evaluation Form Develop a feedback survey to gather participants

SayPro Post-Training Evaluation Form for February Generator Repair Workshop

To ensure continuous improvement and provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the February Generator Repair Workshop, SayPro will create a detailed post-training evaluation form. This feedback survey will gather participants’ thoughts on the session, assess the quality of the training, and identify areas for improvement. The survey will be sent to all attendees after the workshop to understand their learning experience and ensure that future sessions are better tailored to their needs.

---

1. Survey Overview

Survey Title:

Post-Training Evaluation: February Generator Repair Workshop

Introduction Text:

“Thank you for participating in the SayPro February Generator Repair Workshop! We value your feedback and would appreciate it if you could take a few minutes to complete this short evaluation form. Your insights will help us improve future workshops and ensure that we continue to provide valuable, high-quality training sessions.”

---

2. Evaluation Form Structure

Section 1: General Information

(These questions help to understand the background of the participants and their experience.)

1. How would you rate your overall experience in the workshop?
   (Scale: 1 – Very Poor, 5 – Excellent)
   • 1
   • 2
   • 3
   • 4
   • 5
2. Which session did you attend?
   • In-Person Session
   • Online Session
3. How would you describe your experience with the online platform (Zoom, if applicable)?
   (Scale: 1 – Very Poor, 5 – Excellent)
   • 1
   • 2
   • 3
   • 4
   • 5
4. How would you rate the clarity of the session’s objectives?
   (Scale: 1 – Not Clear, 5 – Very Clear)
   • 1
   • 2
   • 3
   • 4
   • 5

---

Section 2: Content Quality

(Assess the relevance, depth, and clarity of the material presented.)

5. How relevant was the content to your current role or expertise?
   (Scale: 1 – Not Relevant, 5 – Highly Relevant)
   • 1
   • 2
   • 3
   • 4
   • 5
6. How would you rate the quality of the presentation materials (slides, documents, reports)?
   (Scale: 1 – Very Poor, 5 – Excellent)
   • 1
   • 2
   • 3
   • 4
   • 5
7. How would you rate the depth of the content covered (troubleshooting techniques, repair scenarios, etc.)?
   (Scale: 1 – Too Shallow, 5 – Just Right)
   • 1
   • 2
   • 3
   • 4
   • 5
8. Was the February Generator Repair Report by SCDR useful in understanding real-world applications and scenarios?
   (Scale: 1 – Not Useful, 5 – Very Useful)
   • 1
   • 2
   • 3
   • 4
   • 5

---

Section 3: Instructor Performance

(Measure the effectiveness and engagement of the instructors.)

9. How would you rate the instructors’ knowledge of the material?
   (Scale: 1 – Not Knowledgeable, 5 – Highly Knowledgeable)
   • 1
   • 2
   • 3
   • 4
   • 5
10. How would you rate the instructors’ ability to explain complex topics clearly?
    (Scale: 1 – Not Clear, 5 – Very Clear)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

11. How engaged did you feel with the instructor during the session?
    (Scale: 1 – Not Engaged, 5 – Very Engaged)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

12. How effective was the use of interactive features (e.g., breakout rooms, Q&A, polls)?
    (Scale: 1 – Not Effective, 5 – Very Effective)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

---

Section 4: Interaction and Engagement

(Assess how participants interacted with the training environment, peers, and instructors.)

13. How useful were the breakout room discussions in helping you understand the material?
    (Scale: 1 – Not Useful, 5 – Very Useful)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

14. Did you feel that you had ample opportunity to ask questions and participate in discussions?

• Yes
• No
• Somewhat

15. How would you rate the overall engagement and interaction during the online session?
    (Scale: 1 – Not Engaging, 5 – Very Engaging)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

---

Section 5: Logistics and Support

(Review the logistics, technical aspects, and support provided throughout the session.)

16. How would you rate the registration process for the workshop?
    (Scale: 1 – Difficult, 5 – Very Easy)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

17. Did you experience any technical issues during the workshop (e.g., sound, video, connection)?

• Yes
• No
• If yes, please explain: [Open text]

18. How would you rate the effectiveness of the pre-workshop communication (confirmation emails, reminders, etc.)?
    (Scale: 1 – Not Effective, 5 – Very Effective)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

---

Section 6: Suggestions for Improvement

(Collect qualitative feedback on how to improve future sessions.)

19. What was the most valuable aspect of the workshop for you?
    [Open text]
20. What areas of the workshop do you think could be improved?
    [Open text]
21. Are there any additional topics or subjects you would like to see covered in future workshops?
    [Open text]
22. Would you recommend this workshop to a colleague or industry professional?

• Yes
• No
• Maybe

---

Section 7: Final Thoughts

(Conclude the survey with any final comments from participants.)

23. Any other comments or feedback you’d like to provide?
    [Open text]

---

3. Survey Distribution and Response Tracking

Survey Distribution:

• Timing: The evaluation survey will be sent out within 24 hours after the workshop ends, ensuring participants have fresh memories of their experience.
• Medium: The survey will be delivered via email, with a direct link to the survey hosted on a platform like Google Forms or SurveyMonkey.
• Incentives: To encourage responses, offer a discount on future workshops or a prize drawing for one lucky respondent.

Tracking Response Rates:

• Set a reminder to participants who haven’t filled out the survey 3-5 days after the initial send-out.
• Track the completion rate and analyze the feedback in real time to identify patterns and areas for improvement.

---

4. Analyzing Feedback

Once the survey responses are collected, SayPro will analyze the results to identify areas of strength and opportunities for improvement:

• Quantitative Analysis: Aggregate responses for questions with rating scales to identify overall satisfaction levels and trends.
• Qualitative Analysis: Review open-ended responses for recurring themes or suggestions (e.g., more hands-on practice, clearer instructions, additional troubleshooting scenarios).
• Action Plan: Based on feedback, create an action plan to address key areas of improvement for the next workshop (e.g., adjusting session content, improving technical support, enhancing participant engagement).

---

Conclusion

The Post-Training Evaluation Form is an essential tool for gathering meaningful feedback from workshop participants. By evaluating the effectiveness of the content, instructors, online platform, and overall experience, SayPro can continuously improve its training offerings and ensure that future workshops are even more engaging and valuable to participants.