SayPro Charity, NPO and Welfare

SayProApp Machines Services Jobs Courses Sponsor Donate Study Fundraise Training NPO Development Events Classified Forum Staff Shop Arts Biodiversity Sports Agri Tech Support Logistics Travel Government Classified Charity Corporate Investor School Accountants Career Health TV Client World Southern Africa Market Professionals Online Farm Academy Consulting Cooperative Group Holding Hosting MBA Network Construction Rehab Clinic Hospital Partner Community Security Research Pharmacy College University HighSchool PrimarySchool PreSchool Library STEM Laboratory Incubation NPOAfrica Crowdfunding Tourism Chemistry Investigations Cleaning Catering Knowledge Accommodation Geography Internships Camps BusinessSchool

SayPro Judging Evaluation Template: A document for judges to rate each project based on predefined criteria.

SayPro is a Global Solutions Provider working with Individuals, Governments, Corporate Businesses, Municipalities, International Institutions. SayPro works across various Industries, Sectors providing wide range of solutions.

Email: info@saypro.online Call/WhatsApp: Use Chat Button 👇

SayPro Judging Evaluation Template
Quarterly Innovation Challenge Judging Evaluation
Version 1.0
Date: [Insert Date]


1. Participant Information

Provide participant details to identify the project being evaluated.

  • Project Title:
    [Enter Project Title]
  • Team Name (if applicable):
    [Enter Team Name]
  • Judge Name:
    [Enter Judge’s Name]
  • Date of Evaluation:
    [DD/MM/YYYY]

2. Evaluation Criteria

Each project will be evaluated based on the following criteria. Judges should provide a rating on a scale of 1 to 5 for each criterion, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent.

CriteriaRating (1-5)Comments
Creativity and Innovation[1-5][Provide feedback on the originality and innovation of the solution. Does the idea present a fresh approach to solving the problem?]
Feasibility[1-5][Evaluate the technical and practical feasibility of the solution. Is the solution achievable with current technology, resources, and within the timeline?]
Impact[1-5][Assess the potential impact of the solution. How significant will the solution be for the target audience or society?]
Market Potential[1-5][Consider the solution’s potential for market success. Does it have a clear target market? Is there demand for the solution?]
Scalability[1-5][Evaluate how well the solution can be scaled or expanded. Can the project grow and reach a wider audience or impact?]
Clarity and Communication[1-5][Assess the clarity of the project presentation. Was the idea communicated effectively, and were the project details well-organized?]
Sustainability[1-5][Assess the long-term sustainability of the project. Does the solution consider environmental, social, or financial sustainability?]
Prototype or Demonstration[1-5][Evaluate the quality of the prototype or demo provided. How well does the prototype demonstrate the solution in action?]
Problem-Solving Ability[1-5][Assess how well the solution addresses the identified problem. Is the solution the right fit for the problem at hand?]
Overall Presentation[1-5][Consider the overall impression of the project. Was the presentation engaging, well-organized, and convincing?]

3. Additional Criteria

Judges can include any other factors or considerations that may be important to the evaluation of the project.

  • Additional Criteria or Comments:
    [Provide any other factors that contributed to the evaluation of the project.]

4. Final Comments and Recommendations

Judges can provide a brief summary of their overall impression of the project and any suggestions for improvement or next steps.

  • Overall Evaluation (Max 300 words):
    [Provide a summary of your evaluation. What are the project’s strengths and weaknesses? Are there any recommendations for improvement or further development?]
  • Final Recommendation (Select one):
    • Awarded
    • Highly Recommended for Development
    • Needs Improvement
    • Not Recommended

5. Judge’s Signature

By signing below, you confirm that the evaluation has been completed fairly and in accordance with the provided criteria.

  • Judge’s Signature:
    [Enter Signature]

Submit Button
[Submit Evaluation]


This SayPro Judging Evaluation Template provides a structured way for judges to assess each project based on specific, predefined criteria. It ensures a fair and thorough evaluation process, encouraging judges to provide feedback on key areas such as creativity, feasibility, impact, and market potential.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!