SayPro Workshop Feedback Forms

SayPro Documents Required from Employees: Workshop Feedback Forms

The Workshop Feedback Form is an essential document for evaluating the success of the SayPro Monthly January SCSPR-24 event, specifically focusing on the effectiveness of the workshops conducted during the event. This post-event survey will gather participants’ insights, opinions, and suggestions for improvement, allowing SayPro to assess whether the goals of the workshops were met and to identify areas for future enhancement. The feedback will also help in refining event planning and content development for subsequent initiatives.

Below is a detailed outline of the Workshop Feedback Form, including key sections that should be included to collect comprehensive feedback from participants:

Workshop Feedback Form: Key Sections and Information

1. Participant Information:

• Name: (Optional)
• School Name: (Optional)
• Role/Position: (Optional)
• Workshop Attended: A field where the participant selects the specific workshop(s) they attended (e.g., Physical Education Strategies, Community Engagement in Recreation, Inclusive Recreational Programming).

2. Workshop Content Evaluation:

• Clarity of Objectives: On a scale of 1-5, how clear were the objectives of the workshop?
  (1 = Very Unclear, 5 = Very Clear)
• Relevance of Topics: On a scale of 1-5, how relevant were the topics discussed to your role and the needs of your school?
  (1 = Not Relevant, 5 = Very Relevant)
• Usefulness of Information: On a scale of 1-5, how useful did you find the information provided during the workshop?
  (1 = Not Useful, 5 = Very Useful)
• Practical Application: On a scale of 1-5, how likely are you to apply what you learned in your school’s recreational programs?
  (1 = Not Likely, 5 = Very Likely)
• Workshop Materials: On a scale of 1-5, how helpful were the materials (e.g., handouts, slides, online resources) provided during the workshop?
  (1 = Not Helpful, 5 = Very Helpful)

3. Presenter Evaluation:

• Presenter Knowledge: On a scale of 1-5, how would you rate the presenter’s knowledge and expertise on the subject?
  (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent)
• Presenter Engagement: On a scale of 1-5, how engaging was the presenter during the workshop?
  (1 = Not Engaging, 5 = Very Engaging)
• Presenter Communication: On a scale of 1-5, how well did the presenter communicate complex concepts and ideas?
  (1 = Very Poorly, 5 = Very Clearly)
• Interaction and Discussion: On a scale of 1-5, how effective were the interactive elements of the workshop (e.g., discussions, group activities)?
  (1 = Not Effective, 5 = Very Effective)

4. Workshop Organization:

• Workshop Length: On a scale of 1-5, how appropriate was the length of the workshop?
  (1 = Too Short, 5 = Too Long)
• Pacing of Content: On a scale of 1-5, how well was the content paced throughout the workshop?
  (1 = Too Fast, 5 = Too Slow)
• Virtual/Physical Setup (if applicable): On a scale of 1-5, how would you rate the technical aspects of the workshop (e.g., sound, video quality, accessibility)?
  (1 = Very Poor, 5 = Excellent)

5. Event Overall Evaluation:

• Overall Experience: On a scale of 1-5, how would you rate your overall experience at the workshop?
  (1 = Very Poor, 5 = Excellent)
• Overall Event Satisfaction: On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied are you with the SayPro Monthly January SCSPR-24 event overall?
  (1 = Very Unsatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied)

6. Suggestions for Improvement:

• Content Improvement: What specific aspects of the workshop content would you suggest improving or expanding upon?
  (Open-ended response)
• Presenter Feedback: What suggestions do you have for the presenter to improve their delivery or engagement?
  (Open-ended response)
• Event Logistics: Are there any suggestions for improving the overall event logistics (e.g., timing, structure, virtual setup)?
  (Open-ended response)

7. Future Topics and Needs:

• Additional Topics: What topics or areas of recreational programming would you like to see covered in future workshops or events?
  (Open-ended response)
• Additional Support: What kind of ongoing support would be most valuable to you after the event (e.g., follow-up workshops, resource libraries, one-on-one consultations)?
  (Open-ended response)

8. General Comments:

• General Feedback: Do you have any additional feedback, comments, or suggestions for improving the overall experience of the event or workshop?
  (Open-ended response)

9. Rating Summary (Optional):

• A final rating section where participants can summarize their evaluation on an overall scale:
  • Rate the Event Overall: 1 to 5 stars (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent)
  • Would you recommend this workshop to other educators?: [ ] Yes [ ] No

Example of Workshop Feedback Form:

Workshop Feedback Form

1. Participant Information:

• Name (Optional): _______________________
• School Name (Optional): ________________
• Role/Position (Optional): _______________
• Workshop Attended: ____________________

2. Workshop Content Evaluation:

• Clarity of Objectives: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Relevance of Topics: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Usefulness of Information: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Practical Application: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Workshop Materials: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

3. Presenter Evaluation:

• Presenter Knowledge: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Presenter Engagement: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Presenter Communication: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Interaction and Discussion: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

4. Workshop Organization:

• Workshop Length: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Pacing of Content: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Virtual/Physical Setup: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

5. Event Overall Evaluation:

• Overall Experience: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Overall Event Satisfaction: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

6. Suggestions for Improvement:

• Content Improvement: _____________________
• Presenter Feedback: ______________________
• Event Logistics: __________________________

7. Future Topics and Needs:

• Additional Topics: _______________________
• Additional Support: _______________________

8. General Comments:

• General Feedback: ________________________

9. Rating Summary (Optional):

• Rate the Event Overall: [ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5
• Would you recommend this workshop to other educators? [ ] Yes [ ] No

Conclusion:

The Workshop Feedback Form is a critical tool for assessing the success of the workshops conducted during the SayPro Monthly January SCSPR-24 initiative. It will provide event organizers with valuable data on how well the workshops met participants’ needs and expectations, highlight areas for improvement, and inform future event planning. By collecting both quantitative and qualitative feedback, SayPro can continuously improve its initiatives to better serve educators and students alike.